Protests challenging the evaluation of the awardee’s labor mix are sustained where the agency made unsupported assumptions regarding the labor mix.Ĥ. Protest that the awardee’s quotation took exception to the solicitation’s data rights clause is sustained where the quotation clearly limited the government rights in a manner contrary to the solicitation.ģ. Protest challenging the evaluation of the awardee’s corporate experience is sustained where the record does not reasonably explain why the agency credited the awardee with the experience of its corporate parent.Ģ. Hurt, Esq., Erik Troff, Esq., David Smith, Esq., Ken Lieb, Esq., and Randy Stone, Esq., Defense Health Agency, for the agency.Ĭharles W. Morrow, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.ġ. Larkin, Esq., Steptoe and Johnson, LLP, for PricewaterhouseCoopers Public Sector LLP, the intervenor.ĭavid S. Darst, Esq., Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, PC, for CALIBRE Systems, Inc., the protesters. Casimir, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP, and Brian A.

Plymale, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, for Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. Turetzky, Esq., Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, for Deloitte Consulting, LLP Kevin C. Aronie, Esq., Katie Calogero, Esq., and Matthew W.

Calibre systems arlington